Jim’s parents spy on him everyday. They are able to see everything he does and everything that he says. They even know about him better than him knowing about himself. Jim finds out that he is being spied on, and he is absolutely horrified. After all this time, his parents whom he loved the most betrayed him the worst way possible. He decides to abandon his home and chooses to never go back there again. Because parents invade their kids’ privacy on social media, kids get upset and lose their trust in their parents. This links to how students and parents disagree on how teens should use social media. Parents should not spy on their kids because privacy should be respected and kids should be independent. Critics may claim that social media negative influences on society; however, this is not a valid argument because social media helps people with communication and building relationships.
Parents should not interfere in their kids’ social media use if they can prove they are credible because privacy should be respected and trust should still maintain. If kids’ are not truthful, parents may have the reason to view their children’s privacy. Dan, father of three teenagers, stated that, “I trust you, and respect your privacy. The only thing is… trust is a two-way street. If at some point you started lying to us or deceiving us, then we would lose that trust.” This means that if the kids’ can prove to their parents that they are trustable, then the parents shouldn’t snoop around their children’s’ social media. As a result, trust can be gained or lost. Parents’ decision to check their children’s social media should be based on their children’s honesty. If the kids don’t tell the truth frequently to their parents, then the parents should have the reason to be able to view their children’s private accounts. If trust between the parents and the kids can be maintained, there is no reason for parents to view their children’s private information. Therefore for these reasons, parents decision to intervene with kids’ social media accounts should be based on their kids’ honesty.
Another reason parents should not spy on their children’s social media is that kids need to be independent. Under their parent’s watchful vision, kids would never be independent. That is why parents should not spy on their kids. An artifact states that, “The privacy organization TRUSTe proposes a different approach: parents should not censor their children online. Instead, they should “‘trust, but verify.”’ This means that parents shouldn’t follow everything that their kids do. A little bit of caution for their kids is okay, but never should parents spy or censor their children. There’s a line between “a little bit of caution”, and “invasion of privacy”. ”A little bit of caution” means that parents warn their children about the some websites children should not enter, and maybe check a few times on their kids. “Invasion of privacy” means that parents watch their children at all time, censor social media, and even spy on their kids. The children will never be comfortable on the internet and wouldn’t be independent. As expressed, parents never should completely invade their children’s privacy. There’s a limit to parents’ actions, and nobody should cross it.
By contrast, some critics may claim that social media is a wicked platform that has a damaging influence on teens. For example, a man named Anthony Orsini claimed that: “There is absolutely, positively no reason for any middle school student to be part of a social networking site! None. It doesn’t help them to have more friends.” Given the evidence, some may conclude that social networking sites have negative impacts on teens. Some will think that we will need to ban social media from teens. Although this argument appears to be convincing at first, social media actually has significant benefits to everybody in our society. A website named Reach Out stated that, “The internet and social media provide young people with a range of benefits, and opportunities to empower themselves in a variety of ways. Young people can maintain social connections and support networks that otherwise wouldn’t be possible, and can access more information than ever before. The communities and social interactions young people form online can be invaluable for bolstering and developing young people’s self-confidence and social skills.” The evidence suggests that social media is actually a great platform that can assists people in a varieties of ways. This shows the critics who claim social media is bad for the society are incorrect. People can communicate with each other on the other side of the world. Individuals actually can create, and strengthen relationships with others by social media. There are lots of ways social media can benefit human use. After looking closely at both sides of the issue and the evidence, one can see that social media is a beneficial creation to society. Teens should not be banned from accessing social media.
In conclusion, parents should not spy on their children since privacy should not be invaded and independence in kids must develop. Dignity is lost when parents spy on their children. When their children find out that they’re being spied on, all trust is gone. A little bit of warning their children is okay, but spying on their kids’ without informing them is unacceptable. Parents must consider what would their children feel if they knew that their parents have been lying to them the whole time.